Abstract
Practical problem in geotechnical design of support systems for tunnels, slopes, and excavation pits requires numerical modeling of different phases of excavation and support installation. The applied constitutive model should therefore include aspects of the influence of the loading history on the deformation response of the rock material during both loading and unloading. Notwithstanding the practical significance, researches into this subject-matter with a view to soft rocks are rare. Some aspects of deformational behavior of soft rock after unloading given in this paper are based on results of time-cycling loading and stepwise unloading long-term creep experiments conducted by the authors on the marl specimens. The results of the experiment indicate that the time of unloading \(t_{\mathrm{c}}\) measured from the beginning of a specific load history is a basic parameter, which can describe the influence of history on the deformation response of marl because it implicitly reflects the process of preconsolidation (hardening) of the material. The deformation response after unloading is described by determining the dependence of the parameters of the modified Wallner rheological model of \(t_{\mathrm{c}}\). This approach requires a larger volume of experimental data, so a semiempirical approach has been applied as an alternative, which can include the influence of magnitude of creep stress, the time of maintaining such stress before unloading, and the duration of the last period in which rock material was completely unloaded during load history.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahlquist, C.N., Nix, W.D.: A technique for measuring mean internal stress during high temperature creep. Scr. Metall. 3, 679–682 (1969)
Ashby, M.F.: Boundary defects and atomistic aspects of boundary sliding and diffusional creep. Surf. Sci. 31, 498–542 (1972)
Cristescu, N.D., Hunsche, U.: Time Effects in Rock Mechanics. Wiley, New York (1998)
Hunsche, U.: Measurements of creep in rock salt at small strain rates. In: Hardy, H.R., Langer, M. Jr. (eds.) The Mechanical Behavior of Salt II, Proc. of the Second Conf., Hannover (FRG), 1984. Trans Tech Publications, Clausthal, pp. 187–196 (1988)
Ito, H., Sasajima, S.: A ten year creep experiment on small rock specimens. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 24(2), 113–121 (1987)
Jackson, I.: Physical origins of anelasticity and attenuation in rock. In: Treatise on Geophysics, Vol. 2, Properties of Rocks and Minerals, pp. 493–525. Elsevier, Boston (2008)
Jiang, Q., Qi, Y., Wang, Z., Zhou, C.: An extended Nishihara model for the description of three stages of sandstone creep. Geophys. J. Int. 193(2), 841–854 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt028
Lu, Y., Wang, L.: Effect of water and temperature on short-term and creep mechanical behaviors of coal measures mudstone. Environ. Earth Sci. 76(17), 1–15 (2017)
Munson, D.E., Devries, K.L., Fossum, A.F., Callahan, G.D.: Extension of the M-D model for treating stress drops in salt. In: Conference on the Mechanical Behavior of Salt, Paliseau, France, vol. 25 (1993). https://doi.org/10.2172/10173279
Pettijohn, F.J.: Sedimentary Rocks, Joanna Cotler Books, 2nd Revised edn. (1957)
Price, N.J.: A study of the time-strain behaviour of coal-measure rocks. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 1, 277–303 (1964)
Raj, R., Ashby, M.F.: On grain boundary sliding and diffusional creep. Metall. Trans. 2, 1113–1127 (1971)
Rassouli, F.S., Zoback, M.D.: Comparison of short-term and long-term creep experiments in shales and carbonates from unconventional gas reservoirs. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 51, 1995–2014 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1444-y
Tan, T.K., Kang, W.F.: Locked in stresses, creep and dilatancy of rocks, and constitutive equations. Rock Mech. 13, 5–22 (1980)
Tomanovic, Z.: Rheological model of soft rock based on test on marl. Mech. Time-Depend. Mater. 10(2), 135–154 (2006)
Tomanovic, Z.: The stress and time dependent behaviour of soft rock. J. Civ. Eng. 64(12), 993–1007 (2012)
Wallner, M.: Stability calculation concerning a room and pillar design in rock salt. In: International Congress for Geotechnics, Melbourne (1983)
Xu, J., Chen, J., Jiang, P., et al.: Investigation of creep behaviors of Wudang mica schist by triaxial compression tests. Geotech. Geolog. Eng. 37, 3831–3842 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-019-00872-7
Yang, S., Jiang, Y.: Triaxial mechanical creep behaviour of sandstone. Min. Sci. Technol. 20(3), 339–349 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1674-5264(09)60206-4
Zhang, D., Ye, C., Zhang, X., Qi, X., Yang, Y., Li, X.: Linkage-based device for creep testing of coal rock. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91, 015108 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5122763
Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Wang, W., Wan, W., Ma, W.: Separation of elastoviscoplastic strains of rock and a nonlinear creep model. Int. J. Geomech. 18(1), 04017129 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001033
Zheng, H., Feng, X., Hao, X.: A creep model for weakly consolidated porous sandstone including volumetric creep. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 78, 99–107 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.04.021
Zivaljevic, S., Tomanovic, Z.: Experimental research of the effects of pre-consolidation on the time-dependent deformations—creep of marl. Mech. Time-Depend. Mater. 19(1), 43–59 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-014-9250-8
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Modified Wallner’s model
Modified Wallner’s model consists of five different rheological bodies, each of which corresponds to an appropriate deformation component (Fig. 34).
When a stress level is below the plastic limit, the creep strain is limited to primary and secondary creep, and hence the total strain is a sum of elastic strain and strains of primary and secondary creep:
Elastic component
In case of the uniaxial stress state, equation (20), provided that the stress and strain states are time-independent, becomes
where \(E\) refers to the Young modulus of elasticity, \(\Delta \sigma _{1}\) denotes the main normal stress difference, and \(\varepsilon _{1}\) stands for the main strain (in the direction of axis of the main normal stress).
Primary creep
With the introduction of \(\sigma _{2} = \sigma _{3} = 0\), the following applies:
When equations (24) and (25) are included into equation (21), for the case of uniaxial stress state, equation (21) has the following form:
After regrouping, we obtain:
A linear nonhomogenous differential equation has the following form:
After separation of variables and integration, we obtain
where the integration constant C is determined based on the initial condition \(\varepsilon ( t = 0 ) = 0\):
Hence, after the constant \(C\) is included in equation (29), a solution of the equation is
After replacement of \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \) and regrouping, we obtain the following final form of equation for primary creep at uniaxial loading:
Secondary creep
For the uniaxial compression, with introduction of \(\sigma _{2} = \sigma _{3} = 0\) and \(\sigma _{eff} = \sigma _{1}\), equation (22) is reduced to
that is, after integration of (33), we obtain:
where the integration constant \(C \) is defined based on the initial condition \(\varepsilon _{1\,\left ( t = 0 \right )}^{p} = 0\ \Rightarrow\ C=0\). Hence the final form of the equation for secondary creep at uniaxial compression is
Final constitutive equation of modified Wallner’s model at uniaxial stress state below the yield condition
By substituting equation (23) for elastic component of deformation and equation (32) for primary creep and equation (35) for secondary creep into equation (19) we obtain the following constitutive equation for rock creep at uniaxial stress state below the plastic limit:
Appendix 2
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zivaljevic, S., Tomanovic, Z. Loading history effect on time-dependent deformations after unloading – reversible creep of soft rock (marl). Mech Time-Depend Mater 26, 499–530 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-021-09498-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-021-09498-w