Skip to main content
Log in

Loading history effect on time-dependent deformations after unloading – reversible creep of soft rock (marl)

  • Published:
Mechanics of Time-Dependent Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Practical problem in geotechnical design of support systems for tunnels, slopes, and excavation pits requires numerical modeling of different phases of excavation and support installation. The applied constitutive model should therefore include aspects of the influence of the loading history on the deformation response of the rock material during both loading and unloading. Notwithstanding the practical significance, researches into this subject-matter with a view to soft rocks are rare. Some aspects of deformational behavior of soft rock after unloading given in this paper are based on results of time-cycling loading and stepwise unloading long-term creep experiments conducted by the authors on the marl specimens. The results of the experiment indicate that the time of unloading \(t_{\mathrm{c}}\) measured from the beginning of a specific load history is a basic parameter, which can describe the influence of history on the deformation response of marl because it implicitly reflects the process of preconsolidation (hardening) of the material. The deformation response after unloading is described by determining the dependence of the parameters of the modified Wallner rheological model of \(t_{\mathrm{c}}\). This approach requires a larger volume of experimental data, so a semiempirical approach has been applied as an alternative, which can include the influence of magnitude of creep stress, the time of maintaining such stress before unloading, and the duration of the last period in which rock material was completely unloaded during load history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlquist, C.N., Nix, W.D.: A technique for measuring mean internal stress during high temperature creep. Scr. Metall. 3, 679–682 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, M.F.: Boundary defects and atomistic aspects of boundary sliding and diffusional creep. Surf. Sci. 31, 498–542 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cristescu, N.D., Hunsche, U.: Time Effects in Rock Mechanics. Wiley, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunsche, U.: Measurements of creep in rock salt at small strain rates. In: Hardy, H.R., Langer, M. Jr. (eds.) The Mechanical Behavior of Salt II, Proc. of the Second Conf., Hannover (FRG), 1984. Trans Tech Publications, Clausthal, pp. 187–196 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, H., Sasajima, S.: A ten year creep experiment on small rock specimens. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 24(2), 113–121 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, I.: Physical origins of anelasticity and attenuation in rock. In: Treatise on Geophysics, Vol. 2, Properties of Rocks and Minerals, pp. 493–525. Elsevier, Boston (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Q., Qi, Y., Wang, Z., Zhou, C.: An extended Nishihara model for the description of three stages of sandstone creep. Geophys. J. Int. 193(2), 841–854 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y., Wang, L.: Effect of water and temperature on short-term and creep mechanical behaviors of coal measures mudstone. Environ. Earth Sci. 76(17), 1–15 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Munson, D.E., Devries, K.L., Fossum, A.F., Callahan, G.D.: Extension of the M-D model for treating stress drops in salt. In: Conference on the Mechanical Behavior of Salt, Paliseau, France, vol. 25 (1993). https://doi.org/10.2172/10173279

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pettijohn, F.J.: Sedimentary Rocks, Joanna Cotler Books, 2nd Revised edn. (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, N.J.: A study of the time-strain behaviour of coal-measure rocks. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 1, 277–303 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raj, R., Ashby, M.F.: On grain boundary sliding and diffusional creep. Metall. Trans. 2, 1113–1127 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rassouli, F.S., Zoback, M.D.: Comparison of short-term and long-term creep experiments in shales and carbonates from unconventional gas reservoirs. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 51, 1995–2014 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1444-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, T.K., Kang, W.F.: Locked in stresses, creep and dilatancy of rocks, and constitutive equations. Rock Mech. 13, 5–22 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomanovic, Z.: Rheological model of soft rock based on test on marl. Mech. Time-Depend. Mater. 10(2), 135–154 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomanovic, Z.: The stress and time dependent behaviour of soft rock. J. Civ. Eng. 64(12), 993–1007 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallner, M.: Stability calculation concerning a room and pillar design in rock salt. In: International Congress for Geotechnics, Melbourne (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., Chen, J., Jiang, P., et al.: Investigation of creep behaviors of Wudang mica schist by triaxial compression tests. Geotech. Geolog. Eng. 37, 3831–3842 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-019-00872-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S., Jiang, Y.: Triaxial mechanical creep behaviour of sandstone. Min. Sci. Technol. 20(3), 339–349 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1674-5264(09)60206-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D., Ye, C., Zhang, X., Qi, X., Yang, Y., Li, X.: Linkage-based device for creep testing of coal rock. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91, 015108 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5122763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Wang, W., Wan, W., Ma, W.: Separation of elastoviscoplastic strains of rock and a nonlinear creep model. Int. J. Geomech. 18(1), 04017129 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, H., Feng, X., Hao, X.: A creep model for weakly consolidated porous sandstone including volumetric creep. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 78, 99–107 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.04.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zivaljevic, S., Tomanovic, Z.: Experimental research of the effects of pre-consolidation on the time-dependent deformations—creep of marl. Mech. Time-Depend. Mater. 19(1), 43–59 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-014-9250-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Zivaljevic.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Modified Wallner’s model

Modified Wallner’s model consists of five different rheological bodies, each of which corresponds to an appropriate deformation component (Fig. 34).

Fig. 34
figure 34

Structure of modified Wallner’s rheological model

When a stress level is below the plastic limit, the creep strain is limited to primary and secondary creep, and hence the total strain is a sum of elastic strain and strains of primary and secondary creep:

$$ \varepsilon = \varepsilon ^{el} + \varepsilon ^{p} + \varepsilon ^{s}. $$
(19)
Table 4 Review of constitutive equations for rock (stress level below the plastic limit)

Elastic component

In case of the uniaxial stress state, equation (20), provided that the stress and strain states are time-independent, becomes

$$ \varepsilon _{1}^{el} = \frac{\Delta \sigma _{1}}{E}, $$
(23)

where \(E\) refers to the Young modulus of elasticity, \(\Delta \sigma _{1}\) denotes the main normal stress difference, and \(\varepsilon _{1}\) stands for the main strain (in the direction of axis of the main normal stress).

Primary creep

With the introduction of \(\sigma _{2} = \sigma _{3} = 0\), the following applies:

$$ \Delta S_{1} = \frac{2}{3}\Delta \sigma _{1},\qquad \Delta S_{2} = - \frac{1}{3}\Delta \sigma _{1},\qquad \Delta S_{3} = - \frac{1}{3}\Delta \sigma _{1}, $$
(24)
$$ \Delta \sigma _{eff} = \Delta \sigma _{1},\qquad \Delta \varepsilon ^{p}_{eff} = \frac{2}{3}\varepsilon _{1},\qquad \left \langle G \right \rangle = E_{p}\left [ \left ( \frac{\Delta \sigma _{1}}{E_{p}} \right )^{m} - \varepsilon _{1}^{p} \right ]. $$
(25)

When equations (24) and (25) are included into equation (21), for the case of uniaxial stress state, equation (21) has the following form:

$$ \frac{d\varepsilon _{1}^{p}}{dt} = \frac{1}{\mu _{p}}E_{p}\left [ \left ( \frac{\Delta \sigma _{1}}{E_{p}} \right )^{m} - \frac{2}{3}\varepsilon _{1}^{p} \right ]. $$
(26)

After regrouping, we obtain:

$$ \frac{\partial \varepsilon _{1}^{p}}{\partial t} + \frac{2}{3}\frac{E_{p}}{\mu _{p}}\varepsilon _{1}^{p} = \frac{E_{p}}{\mu _{p}}\left ( \frac{\Delta \sigma _{1}}{E_{p}} \right )^{m},\qquad \alpha = \frac{2}{3}\frac{E_{p}}{\mu _{p}},\qquad \beta = \frac{E_{p}}{\mu _{p}}\left ( \frac{\Delta \sigma _{1}}{E_{p}} \right )^{m}. $$
(27)

A linear nonhomogenous differential equation has the following form:

$$ \frac{\partial \varepsilon _{1}^{p}}{\partial t} + \alpha \varepsilon _{1}^{\mathrm{p}} = \beta . $$
(28)

After separation of variables and integration, we obtain

$$ \varepsilon _{1}^{p} = \frac{\beta }{\alpha } + Ce^{ - \alpha t}, $$
(29)

where the integration constant C is determined based on the initial condition \(\varepsilon ( t = 0 ) = 0\):

$$ C = - \frac{\beta }{\alpha }. $$
(30)

Hence, after the constant \(C\) is included in equation (29), a solution of the equation is

$$ \varepsilon _{1}^{p} = \frac{\beta }{\alpha } \left ( 1 - e^{ - \alpha t} \right ). $$
(31)

After replacement of \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \) and regrouping, we obtain the following final form of equation for primary creep at uniaxial loading:

$$ \varepsilon _{1}^{p} = \frac{3}{2}\left ( \frac{\Delta \sigma _{1}}{E_{p}} \right )^{m}\left ( 1 - e^{ - \frac{2}{3}\frac{E_{p}}{\eta _{p}}t} \right ). $$
(32)

Secondary creep

For the uniaxial compression, with introduction of \(\sigma _{2} = \sigma _{3} = 0\) and \(\sigma _{eff} = \sigma _{1}\), equation (22) is reduced to

$$ \frac{\partial \varepsilon _{1}^{s}}{\partial t} = \frac{1}{\mu _{p}}\sigma _{1}^{n} = a\sigma _{1}^{n}, $$
(33)

that is, after integration of (33), we obtain:

$$ \varepsilon _{1}^{s} = a\sigma _{1}^{n}t + C, $$
(34)

where the integration constant \(C \) is defined based on the initial condition \(\varepsilon _{1\,\left ( t = 0 \right )}^{p} = 0\ \Rightarrow\ C=0\). Hence the final form of the equation for secondary creep at uniaxial compression is

$$ \varepsilon _{1}^{s} = a\sigma _{1}^{n}t. $$
(35)

Final constitutive equation of modified Wallner’s model at uniaxial stress state below the yield condition

By substituting equation (23) for elastic component of deformation and equation (32) for primary creep and equation (35) for secondary creep into equation (19) we obtain the following constitutive equation for rock creep at uniaxial stress state below the plastic limit:

$$ \varepsilon = \frac{\Delta \sigma _{1}}{E} + \frac{3}{2}\left ( \frac{\Delta \sigma _{1}}{E_{p}} \right )^{m}\left ( 1 - e^{ - \frac{2}{3}\frac{E_{p}}{\eta _{p}}t} \right ) + a\left ( \sigma _{1} \right )^{n}t. $$
(36)

Appendix 2

Table 5 Measured values of the reversible creep strains accompanying diagram illustrated in Fig. 11
Table 6 Measured average values of the reversible creep strains accompanying diagram illustrated in Fig. 12
Table 7 Measured average values of the reversible creep strains accompanying diagram illustrated in Fig. 13
Table 8 Measured average values of the reversible creep strains accompanying diagram illustrated in Fig. 14
Table 9 Measured average values of the reversible creep strains accompanying diagram illustrated in Fig. 15

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zivaljevic, S., Tomanovic, Z. Loading history effect on time-dependent deformations after unloading – reversible creep of soft rock (marl). Mech Time-Depend Mater 26, 499–530 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-021-09498-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-021-09498-w

Keywords

Navigation